Service Detail

BIM Coordination & QA for Clash-Free Delivery

Catch coordination problems before they become RFIs, redraws, or permit delays with a disciplined BIM QA and issue-tracking workflow.

ETA Weekly QA cyclesCut coordination rework by 30%+United States / Europe

Best for teams that want cleaner issue sets, fewer surprises during consultant coordination, and measurable model health across milestones.

What This Service Includes

This service combines clash detection, model health audits, and issue reporting so project teams can fix problems while they are still inexpensive.

Coordination Audits

  • Clash detection across architecture and consultant models where files are available
  • Cross-checking between models, sheets, and issued information
  • Issue logs that prioritize what must be fixed before the next milestone

Model Health and Standards

  • Warnings, family usage, view setup, and standards audits
  • Checks for reference integrity, annotation consistency, and documentation readiness
  • Repeatable QA cycles so progress can be measured over time

Process and Workflow

We run QA as a repeatable cycle rather than a one-time review, because the real value comes from closing issues before they multiply.

Step 01

Model intake and ruleset alignment

We review the project files, coordination goals, and issue thresholds that matter most for the upcoming milestone.

Step 02

Clash and standards review

Models and sheets are checked for coordination conflicts, warnings, standards drift, and documentation risks.

Step 03

Issue log and action tracking

Findings are grouped by severity so your team can fix critical problems first and avoid low-value noise.

Step 04

Recheck and closeout

We rerun targeted checks after updates so resolved issues stay closed and handoff confidence improves.

Deliverables

The output is designed to be actionable. Teams should know what is wrong, what matters most, and what is ready for the next milestone.

Included in Every Package

  • Clash detection and issue logs
  • Model health and standards audits
  • Coordinated update tracking across disciplines

Core Outputs

  • Clash detection reports and prioritized issue logs
  • Model health audits covering standards, warnings, and view setup
  • Tracking notes that keep model and drawing set changes aligned

Decision Support

  • Milestone-specific QA summaries for project leads
  • Focused recheck cycles after corrections are made
  • Documentation risks flagged before final issue dates

Pricing and Packages

QA pricing depends on model size, number of disciplines involved, frequency of review cycles, and the level of reporting detail required.

Milestone QA Review

A focused audit ahead of a key submission or issue date.

  • One structured review cycle
  • Prioritized findings and closeout list
  • Fast support for imminent deadlines

Weekly Coordination Cycle

For teams that want issues managed continuously instead of only at the end.

  • Recurring clash and health reviews
  • Updated issue tracking between meetings
  • Better visibility into coordination progress

Pre-Issue Assurance

A higher-control package for major submittals where documentation confidence matters most.

  • Expanded QA scope across models and sheets
  • Severity-based reporting for leadership review
  • Targeted recheck before final handoff

If this service is part of a broader delivery need, these adjacent services and resources are the next pages to review.

Frequently Asked Questions

QA buyers usually care about which tools we support, how findings are reported, and whether the process will actually reduce redline pain.

Can you coordinate architecture against structural and MEP models?

Yes, when those files are available. We review cross-discipline alignment, flag clashes, and keep issue tracking focused on what affects the architectural package most.

What do we receive after each QA cycle?

You receive a prioritized issue log plus summary findings. The point is to show what must be fixed, what is lower priority, and what has already been resolved.

Do you support Navisworks and Revit-based reviews?

Yes. The workflow can support common coordination setups that rely on Revit model reviews, clash detection exports, or broader QA audits depending on how your team works.

How often should QA run?

For active projects, milestone-based reviews are the minimum. Weekly cycles are usually better when coordination complexity is high or issue dates are compressed.

These blog posts expand on the delivery, QA, and workflow questions firms usually explore before buying this service.

Book a consultation

Need to cut RFIs before the next issue date?

Share the current model set and milestone date. We will recommend the QA cycle that gives you the clearest coordination gain.

White-labeled. NDA-protected. We respond within 24 hours.